Sample report · AI Act review

What you get for €990.

After a one-hour call, within five working days: an inventory of your AI tools with your role and risk class for each, a prioritised gap list, an AI-use policy with a training record, and disclosure texts ready to paste.

The company below is fictional. The structure, the reasoning and the dates are the ones we use. Status of the law: 26 September 2026. Not legal advice.

CompanyPrimer d.o.o. (fictional)
Size, sector40 people, accounting and logistics
Tools reviewed5
Delivered5 working days after the call

Summary

Primer d.o.o. uses AI in five places and in all of them it is a deployer: it uses systems that others built. Four uses carry light obligations that are already due and take a few days to cover. One, screening job applications, falls in a high-risk area and needs its own preparation before December 2027.

Do first: adopt the AI-use policy and record who has read it; put the disclosure text on the website chatbot; label realistic AI images. Plan: the recruitment tool, with the supplier and a lawyer.

AI tool inventory

Tool and useWho uses itRoleRiskWhat applies
General AI assistant (business subscription): e-mails, summaries, translationsabout 25 staffdeployerminimalAI literacy (Art. 4). GDPR: no client personal data without a processing agreement.
Website chatbot from a SaaS supplier: answers customer questionscustomersdeployertransparencyPeople must be told they are talking to AI (Art. 50). Check the supplier's setting, add our text.
Candidate ranking in the recruitment platformHR, 2 peopledeployerhigh-risk areaEmployment is in Annex III. Deployer duties from 2 Dec 2027: human oversight, logs, informing candidates.
AI-generated images for social media and the newslettermarketing, 1 persondeployertransparencyRealistic images of people, places or events must be labelled as AI-generated (Art. 50).
Invoice data extraction in the accounting softwareaccounting, 6 peopledeployerminimalAI literacy (Art. 4). A person checks the booking, as today.

Role and risk class depend on the use, not on the product. The same assistant used to decide about people would move up a class, which is why every row states what the tool is used for.

Gap list and next steps

#GapSinceActionEffort
1No written rules for using AI; nobody knows who was trained2 Feb 2025Adopt the attached policy, have staff read it, keep the record1 day
2The chatbot does not say it is AI2 Aug 2026Paste the disclosure text below; confirm with the supplier1 hour
3AI images published without a label2 Aug 2026Add the label below to realistic imagesongoing
4Candidate ranking: unclear who reviews the ranking, whether candidates are told, what is logged2 Dec 2027Ask the supplier for its documentation and instructions for use; assign a reviewer; legal reviewplan in 2027
5Staff paste client data into the general assistantGDPR, nowRule in the policy: no client personal data; check the processing agreementwith #1

AI-use policy (excerpt)

From the one-page policy, adapted to Primer d.o.o. 1. We use the AI tools on the approved list only. New tools are added by the managing director after a short check.
2. We do not enter clients' personal data, salary data or contracts into general AI assistants.
3. A person checks every AI output before it leaves the company or changes a booking.
4. Customers are told when they talk to AI. Realistic AI images are labelled.
5. Everyone who uses AI reads this policy once a year. The record of who read it is kept by HR.

With it you receive the training record as a table (name, date, version read) and a 20-minute briefing outline for staff.

Disclosure texts, ready to paste

Chatbot, first message (EN)Hi, I am an automated assistant (AI). I can answer questions about orders and deliveries. For anything else, or if you prefer a person, write "person" and a colleague will reply.
Chatbot, first message (SL)Pozdravljeni, sem samodejni pomočnik (umetna inteligenca). Odgovorim na vprašanja o naročilih in dostavi. Za vse drugo ali če želite človeka, napišite "človek" in odgovoril vam bo sodelavec.
Label for AI imagesImage generated with AI. · Slika je ustvarjena z umetno inteligenco.

Dates that apply to Primer d.o.o.

DateWhatStatus
2 Feb 2025AI literacy (Art. 4)due, gap #1
2 Aug 2026Transparency (Art. 50): chatbot disclosure, labels on realistic AI imagesdue, gaps #2, #3
2 Dec 2026Machine-readable marking by providers of generative systems already on the marketsupplier's duty, nothing for Primer
2 Dec 2027High-risk systems in Annex III, including recruitmentgap #4

What this report is not

  • Not legal advice and not a certification. No certificate for "AI Act compliance" exists for companies like this one; we recommend that your lawyer reviews the documents.
  • It does not assess the supplier's own obligations as provider; it lists what to ask them for.

The same review for your company: €990 excl. VAT, documents in five working days.